Thanks for the clarification, Don, on CTS4179. It's odd that FTDNA would
not list such a defining SNP in your results.
So, for now, our terminating SNP is L448. Hopefully, some new ones will be
discovered soon.
I am interested on seeing your results. I'm wondering if listed among them
is a SNP that would one day be considered unique to our group.
Thanks!
Michael
> First of all, hello to all my Cooley family! And thanks to Michael for
> adding me to the list and for his excellent work making the latest and
> Cooley genealogy info and Y-DNA data available to the public.
>
> As Michael told you in the intro, I descend from John Cooley's son James.
> From James my Cooley line is: Timothy Goode "Tink" Cooley > John Iven
> Cooley > Daniel Iven Cooley > Elmo Franklin Cooley (my father). My full
> name is Donald Wayne Cooley, but call me Don. I was born in Kirksville,
> Missouri in 1952, but my parent's actual home at the time was in Los
> Angeles, CA. (My Mom went to be with her parents a few weeks before I was
> born because my Dad was working two jobs.) I went to the University of
> Colorado in Boulder, Colorado and grad school at Stanford University in
> Palo Alto, CA. I've been working as a Senior Research Physicist at SRI
> International two miles north of Stanford the past 32 years. I live in
> Fremont, CA with my wife Yolanda and son Patrick.
>
> The Geno 2.0 test looked at Y-DNA 6153 SNPs, see
> http://www.yourgeneticgenealogist.com/2012/07/national-geographic-and-family-tree-dna.html.
> I received an Excel spreadsheet showing 6129 of my Y-DNA SNPs. (Anyone
> want a copy? In making sense of those results, this link comes in handy
> http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_YDNA_SNP_Index.html ) Anyway, this is far
> to many to show on the FTDNA table Michael sent a link to, so they only
> report a few of them there. Because it was discussed, note that CTS4179
> was
> indeed tested for in my Geno 2.0 test, I do NOT have the mutation there.
> So
> I'm CTS4179-.
>
> I'm also L176.1-. But, like Michael, I'm L448+. So that means we Cooleys
> are R1a1a1b1a3. See the nice chart at
> http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_R1a_Y-DNA.shtml and maps see
> http://www.semargl.me/en/dna/ydna/map-snp/35/ and
> http://www.geni.com/projects/R1a-L448-Y-DNA/3941 . Regarding the
> difference
> in nomenclature used at different DNA testing sites, I assume that's
> because the Y-DNA tree is in a state of flux and not everyone has caught
> up. Hence, I might me listed R-M17 one place, R-L448 another. And R1a1a1
> one place and R1a1a1b1a3 another. I personally like the designation
> R-L448.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Don
>
> P.S. According to my new Geno 2.0 DNA test results, I'm only 94.8%
> Cro-Magnon. I'm 3.0% Neanderthal and 2.2% Denisovan. http://
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denisovan
> <http://t.co/VhOFx3Dfnj><http://t.co/VhOFx3Dfnj>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:57 PM, <ancestr2_at_host187.hostmonster.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You're right, Jim. L176- doesn't mean there wasn't a close association.
>> I'm perplexed by the CTS4179- that the R1a group shows for him because
>> it's not listed in Don's results. I have an email off to the admins and
>> have posted on the R1a1 facebook page for an explanation.
>>
>> Here's a couple of things apart from specific markers to chew on...
>>
>> We show only about a half dozen non-Cooley 12/12 matches. There are none
>> at 25 and above. The other R1a1a Cooleys (CF04) show 160 non-Cooley
>> 12/12
>> matches and 55 matches to about 23/25. (I think they *might* be of the
>> Ferguson clan.) Not only are we rare among Cooleys, we're rare among
>> R1a1a
>> Cooleys. I think that means that John came from a small population pool.
>> Could that mean that despite the large size of his family that he came
>> from a long line of few siblings? Could it mean that he came from a
>> region, say somewhere in the Scottish Highlands, that was particularly
>> isolated? Or perhaps he was of a more recent migration from Scotland,
>> perhaos even post Viking? That we have so many matching Cooleys only
>> proves that we've worked hard to get those. But the size of the ftdna
>> database is considerable. That we remain rare and *very* Cooley-centric
>> (I
>> think I coined a new word!) might be significant.
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>> > Thanks, Michael, for all the links and for taking the time to help
>> > explain what it all means.
>> > I'm intrigued by the 15 generations of descent. It's possible that
>> one
>> > day we may match
>> > up with a Cooley that can reliably trace his line back to the 1500s or
>> > beyond. And even
>> > though Don didn't test positive for L176, that's not to say that our
>> > Cooleys didn't pass
>> > through or spend centuries in Scotland before John got on that ship.
>> >
>> > Thanks, Don, for upgrading to the SNP test. I noticed that your
>> > haplogroup is listed as R1a1a1.
>> > Is that just an abbreviation for the unwieldy R1a1a1b1a3a?
>> >
>> > Jim
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 6/25/2013 3:09 PM, ancestr2_at_host187.hostmonster.com wrote:
>> >> Donald Wayne Cooley (a descendant of James) has just gotten back his
>> >> Geno
>> >> 2.0 Y chromosome SNP results. They're posted here under kit #N3690.
>> >> (Remember, the Y chromosome passes from father to son only and is
>> >> essentially a clone; it changes very little from one generation to
>> the
>> >> next.)
>> >>
>> >> http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Cooley/default.aspx?section=ysnp
>> >>
>> >> Those of you who have looked at the Cooley Project's DNA page will be
>> >> somewhat familiar with the STR results:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Cooley/default.aspx?section=yresults
>> >>
>> >> Each number represents the number of times a specified series of
>> >> chemicals
>> >> repeat. It's generally considered that after about 15 generations of
>> >> descent too many mutations are introduced to make comparisons
>> reliable.
>> >> It's no surprise, then, that all the testers in CF01 match so
>> closely,
>> >> as
>> >> most of us are known to be about 7 to 9 generations from John.
>> >>
>> >> SNPs are entirely different. They represent specific, single
>> mutations
>> >> of
>> >> specifically located chemicals, for example, a change from A to G.
>> The
>> >> date at which the mutation occurred can be estimated, in part, by
>> >> determining its frequency in respect to the size of a population. For
>> >> example, the mutation known as M207 encompasses such a huge portion
>> of
>> >> the
>> >> Eurasian population that it is estimated to have occurred between
>> 19,900
>> >> and 34,300 years ago. For all those generations, that mutation has
>> >> passed
>> >> from Don's ancient *patrilineal* ancestor to the present day. It's
>> the
>> >> mutation that is used to define the mega haplogroup R.
>> >>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R-M207
>> >>
>> >> Don and I have both tested positive for the mutation known as L-448.
>> >> This
>> >> is considered to have occurred between 1900 and 2300 years ago in
>> Norway
>> >> and has been dubbed "Young Scandinavian." Don tested negative for the
>> >> presence of L-176.1, which is the Scottish subset of L-448. This is
>> in
>> >> line with earlier interpretations of our STR markers: we are likely
>> >> distantly related to, not descended from, the 12th century Scottish
>> >> chieftain, Somerled.
>> >>
>> >> Lying downstream from L448 and upstream from L176.1 is CTS4179. The
>> R1a
>> >> Project reports that Don is negative for that marker but I don't see
>> >> that
>> >> it was even tested. I have an email into a project admin about that.
>> >>
>> >> Many of the younger markers have been recently discovered, and the
>> >> interpretations are in a state of flux. Some markers once considered
>> to
>> >> be
>> >> defining markers are now found to be specific to certain families and
>> >> have
>> >> been removed from the Y tree. At present, there are very few markers
>> >> that
>> >> have been verified as being "downstream" from L448. But it is my hope
>> >> that
>> >> one day we can lay claim to one of these "private" markers as being
>> >> specific to our clan of Cooleys.
>> >>
>> >> -Michael
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> <a href="http://newsummer.com/distlist">distlist 0.9</a>
>> >> See http://ancestraldata.com/listarchive/johncooleylist/ for list
>> >> information.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > <a href="http://newsummer.com/distlist">distlist 0.9</a>
>> > See http://ancestraldata.com/listarchive/johncooleylist/ for list
>> > information.
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Second VP, the Cooley Family Association of America
>> Administrator, the Akins DNA Project
>> Administrator, the Ashenhurst DNA Project
>> Administrator, the Bishop DNA Project
>> Administrator, the Eldridge DNA Project
>> Administrator, the alt-McDowell DNA Project
>> Co-Administrator, the Cooley DNA Project
>> Co-Administrator, the McDougall DNA Project
>> Instructor "Genealogy and Family History," the Osher Lifelong Learning
>> Institute (OLLI)
>> B.A. Humboldt State University, History
>>
>> --
>> <a href="http://newsummer.com/distlist">distlist 0.9</a>
>> See http://ancestraldata.com/listarchive/johncooleylist/ for list
>> information.
>>
>
--
Second VP, the Cooley Family Association of America
Administrator, the Akins DNA Project
Administrator, the Ashenhurst DNA Project
Administrator, the Bishop DNA Project
Administrator, the Eldridge DNA Project
Administrator, the alt-McDowell DNA Project
Co-Administrator, the Cooley DNA Project
Co-Administrator, the McDougall DNA Project
Instructor "Genealogy and Family History," the Osher Lifelong Learning
Institute (OLLI)
B.A. Humboldt State University, History
Received on Wed Jun 26 2013 - 13:48:49 MDT